It is only suitable for starting this evaluation of President Trump’s second term by listing the achievements of the administration, as highlighted by the White House: The prices of wholesale eggs have declined by 50%, about 9,000 manufacturing jobs have been constructed, deregulation measures resulted in a total savings of $ 11,000, which is a total savings of $ 11,000, which is for a family of four, for a family of four, and with South Korea, and South Korea, and South Korea, and South Korea, and with South Korea, and with South Korea, and South Korea. Each $ 500 billion from Apple, Nvidia, Openai, Oracle and Softbank.
Last week, President Trump sat for an oval office interview with Atlantic employees. The magazine’s editor, Jeffrey Goldberg, recently among the US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and senior administration officials, were recently in the news after joining a coded signal chat including JD Vance. The discussion allegedly included top-patronage details about American military campaigns against Houthis in Yemen.
Goldberg – and Atlantic – Critics of Trump, and Bhavna is mutual. Nevertheless, Trump emphasized the presence of Goldberg in the interview.
The conversation was widespread, in which Goldberg and his team raised difficult questions. Nevertheless, Trump easily sidelined him. As Goldberg saw: “What I found in this special meeting was a trump who was less important, attentive, and was eager to convince us that he is good in his job and good for the country.”
Asked that Goldberg failed to understand about his presidential post, Trump saw: “I really believe that what I am doing is good for the country, good for people, good for humanity.”
It has been pressurized whether there would be more sudden dismissal – such as those who were after a visit to the Oval office of the conspiracy theorist Laura Lumor, due to which the National Security Council officials were removed – Trump reflected on the power of his office: “You know that all this starts. It is a magnificent office. It is a magnificent office. It is a magnificent office. They all want to stop and see: They want to stop and see: They want to see: They want to see: It is a general office:
Trump’s political trajectory
6 January 6 January, from the 45th President, from the 45th President, from Virtual Excel, and now the 47th President – Trump offered a brief summary: “First, I was fighting for existence and I was fighting to run the country. This time I was fighting to help the world and help the country. You know.”
On deporting illegal immigrants without any procedure, Trump remained firm: “We don’t want people to be killed and slapped and slapped and beaten. We do not want to take advantage of business and all these things. We want to keep taxes less. We want a good life.”
Asked how he sees his mission in the office, Trump announced: “I think I am doing a great service to the country. It will be easy for me if I do not do this. I can really get an easy presidential post. Just come here, leave everything, do not go through tariffs. I don’t know it.
Opposite perspective
While Trump considers this moment to be important in history, New York Times sees it through a deep lens. To assess the first 100 days of Trump, the paper invited 15 columnists to contribute to small essays to expand their most important comments in a feature called a new US First Draft. There is a summary here what some of them did.
Mitchell Goldberg, a socially progressive commentator, clearly prepared one of the greatest concerns of the administration: “No citizenship, no right.” She was referring to Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, an illegal immigrant in Al Salvador, who was accidentally deported despite having no criminal allegations in the American Ross Doth, a conservative Christian columnist sometimes said the voice of the Vice President Vance by Wall Street Journal, until the Turiffs of the Turpulists, which is correct.
Brett Stephens, a conservative and editor of the former Jerusalem Post, reflected Trump’s now-the———–ies oval office meltdown with Ukrainian President Volodimier Zelansky: “All had to give to friends of America to complete the meeting and a clear feeling of self-ghuspatha in the White House.”
David Brooks, Orthodox and Surely Servral NYT columnist, was clear that stupidity defines this administration, and why not do it? “If you create an organization in which everyone has to flatter the ruling parochialist, then there will be a result of stupidity.” Carlos Lazada, the winner of the Peru-American and Pulitzer Awards, regretted the shootout of dozens of plus inspectors-generals, who were guards on a wide range of government branches and noted: If Trump really wanted to eliminate waste and malfunctions, why would he finish the officers responsible for identifying the rigor of dollars? “
Gail Collins, among political commentators, Trump renamed the Gulf of the Gulf of the US to recall the name of the US on 1 day and said: “Who does such things do? Kings, may be, which is Trump’s brain.”
For NYT, former India Hand Lidia Polegreen, contrary to high public support for the Trump administration, illegally illegally illegally Ice directors from the United States to the Ice Director to work with aspirations with aspirations to act as opposed to high public support: “We need to be better in behaving like a business.” It should act like Amazon’s prime, “But with humans.” It has been concluded that “transform American constitutional democracy into fascism” with “a button, an arrow and a smile smile. ,
Thomas Freedman, who does not require any introduction, dismissed Trump’s top Pentagon officials over his clear lack of loyalty to the President – at the request of the theorist Laura Lumor of the conspiracy allegedly. He said that similar purse is in another army that he covers: China’s People’s Liberation Army. He concluded: “I had never dreamed of attracting that comparison before. Who knew it would take only 100 days?”
For 30 years, an up-ed columnist Maorn Dowd recalled Trump’s 90-day tariff stagnation, stating Bondholders in his words, citing a little “tippie” (meaning unstable). However, most supervisors – except for Trump’s supporters – believe that the real tipping point came when Bondholders began to seriously consider selling American Treasury Bonds, often compared to gold. Dowd sighs with relief, given that, on rare occasions, reality trump’s make-confidence manages to pierce the world.
Ezra Klein, of course, the second most surbral NYT columnist, said that the decisive moment to define Trump 2.0 came in last July when he chose JD Vance as Vance, as Vance had denied the average that he had also denied that he had opposed the directing of Trump, to close the 2020 votes. “It turns out that Trump’s second term would not give any concession, there is no doubt. The speed and negligence of this presidential is by design,” Klein concluded.
Public assumption and voting trends
So how does the public look at Trump 2.0? According to the voting average of realclearpolitics, their approval rating has declined by 5.2 percent in the last three months, while rejection has increased by 8.1 points – production of net negative swing of 13.3 points.
This is a significant decline in the office from the first week of Trump, when he had 50.5% approval and 44.3% rejection. Data shows that many voters who were open to give Trump a chance – but were not supporters – are now disillusioned. Their rejection ratings between Hispanics, Independents, Moderate and voters under 30 years of age have increased from 45% to 60% in the beginning of today. More than 47% of the registered voters say that Trump is performing worse than expected and 31% says he is more than expected.
Trump’s highest achievement achievement is his nearby halt of illegal immigration. Unexpectedly, their approval is the highest in this region. However, here too, cracks are beginning to show: Most Americans believe that their exile measures are “far away” and “are very rigid.” Even voters who support Trump’s immigration goals believe that their administration is moving very fast, regardless of legal protection.
Perhaps there are widespread concerns about the most troubled regime for Trump. More than 66% of Americans described their administration as chaotic, and 80% of the voters want policies to be carefully implemented, reduced mistakes. The majority believes that the administration should not ignore the decisions of the Supreme Court, eliminate Congress programs, or implement tariffs without legislative approval.
Will Trump focus on rising concerns and reconsider his tariff strategy? Perhaps – especially with shining signals in major economic indicators. The US economy was contracted up to 0.3% in the first quarter, stocked the inventory before adjacent tariffs due to large -scale increased imports. Weak consumer expenses also played a role. As a result, net imports were reduced by 5% from GDP – the largest single -quarter negative effects from trade since 1947.
While retail prices for everyday goods remain stable, major retailers have warned that they will not be able to keep the line longer. Some products have already been discontinued to avoid tariff-inspired price increase.
Nevertheless, it is equally admirable that Trump will remain stable on an issue of the champion for four decades. For example, take Jeff Bezos. Amazon was preparing to label how much tariff has been contributed to the items – how the tax components are displayed, it is equal for. Transparency can have a significant impact, with increasing by 2% to 22% from the average of US tariffs. However, on learning the plan, Trump allegedly called Bezos and warned that such a step would be seen as “hostile and political”. Amazon quickly dropped the idea.
Trump is ever committed to his tariff agenda.
Disclaimer: These are the personal opinions of the author
