Reads early
Summary AI is born, the news room has been reviewed.
The Indo-Pak ceasefire operation follows the terrorists who targets Sindor.
Four countries issued statements regarding ceasefire.
China first expressed displeasure with Pakistan to confuse us.
New Delhi:
Since Operation Sindoor, dust accumulates after a series of Pakistani esc remaining and Indian military reactions during the Sindoor – the objective of the mission was to target terrorists and their supporters in view of Pakistan -linked Pahgam terror attack, now the day was focused on the day which was really gone down the day where the day was declared dramatically.
Four countries issued statements that day – late entry by the United States, Pakistan, India and China. However, the eyebrows have been picked up, it is that each has its own version. While the undisputed fact lies in India’s statement that a phone call was actually made by the Director General of Military Operations to request an immediate ceasefire for its Indian counterpart, the US and China have their own objectives-sometimes comes as a story to prepare with Pakistan which comes as a face-handle for Islamabad (government) and Rawalpind.
‘Trump gun jumps’
Donald Trump, who is presenting himself as a global peace Messiah, was involved in the Russian-Ukraine struggle as well as joining the Israeli-Iran war on Hamas in Gaza, was the first to jump to make a dramatic announcement that it was his administration that “brokeade” ceasefire-world-world Delli had removed himself. President Trump’s eagerness to make an announcement came as a bolt in blue.
Running to his social media platform Truth Social, President Trump wrote, “After a long night of the intermediary conversation by the United States, I am happy to announce that India and Pakistan have agreed to a complete and immediate ceasefire. Congratulations to the two countries.” He said that by doing this, both countries have shown “general knowledge and great intelligence”.
‘Beijing is angry with Islamabad?’
As Hotline in Washington, Islamabad, and New Delhi was busy on 9 May, lived on a hook in Beijing – and it was allegedly not well down with China, which Pakistan calls its “All -Vather Eli”. The declaration of Donald Trump and taking a credit from Washington allegedly left Beijing, which also wishes to see as a global peace broker, fierce.
According to the claims made in defense circles, China was reportedly upset with Islamabad that to reach Washington in times of crisis and crisis rather than calling Beijing, which prefers to South Asia to be in its area. NDTV cannot verify the authenticity of this claim, however, a time -line of factual events is presented below.
Beijing then called Islamabad, after which, according to the chronology of the events, Pakistan announced the eighth hour after Trump agreed, although only briefly. While Pakistani drones violated Indian aircraft over Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab and Gujarat, a statement about Islamabad’s talks with China was issued by Pakistan Foreign Office. The time of statement, in which Beijing’s support for Islamabad was exhausted, was increased to eyebrows in diplomatic circles.
‘China finds relevance’
Some time later, while Pakistan and PoK continued to drown in drones, China’s Foreign Ministry issued another statement saying that its Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke with India’s National Security Advisor Ajit Doval. This statement focused more about what the Chinese Foreign Minister said, which was reportedly said by Mr. Dowal. New Delhi has not responded to this statement released by Beijing.
It was only after the release of these statements, showing China’s participation, prohibiting drone control and international border from Pakistan. This was seen by some defense analysts as a symbolic gesture to satisfy Beijing.
China’s Foreign Ministry issued another statement two days later, in which he said, “We hope that India and Pakistan will continue to cement and continue the pace of ceasefire, avoid further struggle, handle the differences properly through dialogue and dialogue, and return to the track of political disposal.” It states that China will be in touch with both Islamabad and New Delhi, and will continue the efforts to “keep the region peaceful and stable”.
Beijing credited himself for a ceasefire, saying that, the Chinese Foreign Minister’s conversation with Ishaq Dar and Ajit Doval helped to bring about desktation and a complete, permanent ceasefire. “
China supports and welcomes them #Indiapakistanceasefire,
The night of May 10, Director and FM Wang Yi spoke with Pakistan Deputy PM and FM Ishaq Dar @ Mishaqdar50 And to help bring about Decalation and a complete, permanent ceasefire respectively, NSA of India.
We… pic.twitter.com/fe1nibonru
– China MFA spokesman Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman (@MFA_CHINA) May 12, 2025
‘Islamabad Pandars to Beijing’
Pakistan, which was left in shock and disbelief on the intensity, scale, accuracy, accuracy and capacity of India’s accuracy on the Pakistani airbase and the intensity of the calibrated strike, released two sets of statements on the evening of the ceasefire – after the social media post of a Trump, and others in Beijing’s Nihait.
After the post of President Trump on Truth Social, Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar wrote on X that “Pakistan and India have agreed to a ceasefire with immediate effect. Pakistan has always tried for peace and safety in the region, without compromising its sovereignty and regional integrity!”
It then broke the ceasefire for several hours, disregarding its commitment, as well as a statement about a phone call from Beijing. According to the statement, Mr. Dar informed the Chinese Foreign Minister about the regional situation in the wake of the terrorist attack in Pahgam in Jammu and Kashmir and the recent military exchange between India and Pakistan.
‘China-supported statement’
According to the statement, the Chinese Foreign Minister “accepted the restraint of Pakistan and appreciated his responsible view in challenging circumstances,” Wang Yi “said that China confirmed that China, Pakistan’s all-visitor strategic cooperative partner and Iron-clad friend, will stand up to maintain their sovereignty, regional loyalty and national freedom.”
After less than an hour of this, the Pakistani drone incident stopped, leading to a ceasefire. While all this was happening, the Foreign Secretary of India addressed a press briefing, given a strict warning to Islamabad, in view of the fresh airspace violation, that Pakistan’s actions would be answered “strongly” and “effectively” by India.
India has placed all the facts on the table. It has admitted that many phone calls were actually between the top leaders of India and the US. New Delhi claimed that Washington was clearly stated that India was only responding to Pakistan’s military growth, with the first increase for Pahalgam Operation Sindoor. Washington was told that if Islamabad stops, it would be New Delhi. The leaders in the Trump administration were also told that any request for the ceasefire is strictly a bilateral issue, and that Islamabad would have to reach New Delhi directly.
‘Pakistan requested India’
Following the bilateral setup, Pakistan’s DGMO then reached its Indian counterpart with a request for the ceasefire, India’s DGMO warned Pakistan against any other misconception, while also laid conditions for the ceasefire, including zero-oppression for terror. Islamabad was informed that all other punishment against Pakistan would be a diplomatic action.
Foreign Secretary Vicaram Misri then announced a small and point on India, which agreed to Pakistan’s bilateral request for a ceasefire. He said, “The Director General of Pakistan’s Military Operations (DGMO) called India’s DGMO at IST at 3:35 pm today. It was agreed between them that both sides on the ground, in the air, and the sea today would stop all firing and military action on 5 PM IST in the sea.
‘Trump’s claim was rejected’
Two days later, President Trump made another major claim how he used trade as a tool to convince Pakistan and India to agree to a ceasefire. He said, “I said,” Come on, we are going to do a lot of business with you, both countries, then stop it. If you want business then stop it. If you don’t stop, we are not going to do any business. ” He claimed that “people have never used business the way I have used it – and then suddenly he said ‘we are going to stop’. They must have done it for many reasons, but the business was a big.”
Rejecting the claim, India’s Foreign Ministry said, “After the operation began, US vice -president JD Vance spoke to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 9 May. Secretary Rubio spoke to External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on 8 May and 10 May and National Security Advisor Ajit Dawal on 10 May.
