New Delhi:
The Supreme Court set a deadline to clean the bill, to withdraw the bill, to withdraw the decision of Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi’s 10 major bills for “illegal” and “arbitrary”.
The maximum period of one month will be given in a position when the Governor wants to prevent consent for the bill and reserve it for consideration with the advice and advice of the Council of Ministers by the President.
The bill will have to be returned within three months if the Governor wants to stop consent without the help and advice of the minister.
The state has to obtain the consent of the governor within a month in the event of the state assembly being presented after re -considering.
The apex court further ruled that any practice of conscience by the Governor under Article 200 of the Constitution is responsible for judicial review.
The deadline is part of a Supreme Court that the Governor cannot reserve the bill for the President after withdrawing consent. The court said that Governor Ravi did not work in “good faith”.
The governor, the bench said, the bills should have been cleaned when they were re -presented after they were re -passed by the assembly.
The court clarified that it “does not reduce the powers of the Governor in any way”. The bench said, “All the works of the Governor should be aligned with the principle of parliamentary democracy.”
According to Article 200 of the Constitution, the governor can give his consent, prevent consent, or reserve the bill for the President’s view. The governor may send bills or homes back to reconsider some provisions. If the House passes it again, the Governor will not withdraw the acceptance. The Governor, the Constitution, says, a bill can reserve a bill for the idea of the President, which he realizes whether he is on obstacles with the directions of the Constitution, the state policy or a matter of national importance.
