New Delhi:
Discomfort Supreme Court And the government was clear, again, on Monday afternoon as part of the continuous decline of the landmark of the judiciary on 8 April – on setting up a specific timeline to clean the bills presented by the state governments to the governors and the President.
Justice Bra Gavai, listening to a PIL against ‘porn’ content on social media and OTT platforms, states that the material regulation is the responsibility of the government, that is, the responsibility of the executive, and loudly surprised whether it will be advised to the court, already facing flakes, to step into steps.
“It comes to the executive domain … as we are facing allegations of interfering with the executive’s domain!” Justice Gawai, who takes oath as the next Chief Justice on 14 May, said.
The court required an assurance from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, which was present for the government, that the argument being held will not be “taken as adverse litigation”.
The court also received a similar assurance from the petitioner, which was represented by advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, who said, “… it is not an unfavorable argument … it is a serious concern.”
‘Porn’ content online
On the subject of regulating materials on social media and OTT platforms, the bench of Justice Gawai and Justice AG Masih was asked to the government to establish a National Material Authority Association to ban it from streaming ‘sexually clear material’.
Argile claimed that some websites were spreading pornographic material sensation filters and some OTT platform streaming were such that there were potential child pornography.
Read | “Won’t leave the vacuum”: Top court says that can work against pornographic materials
In February in the apex court, hearing a petition by Podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia – A stand -up on YouTube on a ‘Jokes’ on a stand -up comedy show on a ‘Jokes’ – asked the government whether he is planning to take any steps to recognize and regulate such ‘porn’ content.
Today the court was told, “Some regulation is in place … more work is being done.”
“Something must be done …” The court responded to the Solicitor-General, who agreed and said, “Some materials are so distorted that two men cannot sit together and see.”
Government vs Supreme Court?
And then there is a big question – tension between the Supreme Court and the government. The tension broke after the court criticized several bills passed by the state assembly, for the delay, for the delay, for the delay, for the delay.
Mr. Ravi was told that his works were “arbitrary” and “illegal”, and the 10 bills organized by him were passed by the second time when the state’s DMK government presented him.
Read | 10 Tamil Nadu Bill now law, SANS Governor consensus, after big decisions
The court also gave other governors, including other non-BJP states, which were accused of withdrawing the acceptance of the bills by the government, and the President, in cases where the Governor refers to the bill, a tough time limit to pass such a law.
The order triggers a line.
Read | “Parliament should be closed if …”: BJP MP’s big comment on Supreme Court
BJP’s Nishikant Dubey was especially drowning in his criticism, in which the apex court was trying for anarchy. Dinesh Sharma, an ally of Mr. Dubey’s party, also commented.
The BJP took itself away from the comment. Mr. Dubey now faces court hearing,
Read | “No right over Parliament”: J Dhankhar takes a target in the apex court
Repeatedly, repeated remarks were made by Vice President Jagdeep Dhikar, who claimed that the MPs were the “final owners” of the Constitution and The court accused of using a “nuclear missile (Reference was of Article 142, which gives it special powers against democracy) “.
Read | “Institution Under Attack Attack Every Day”: Supreme Court on Judiciary Ro
Last week, Justice Surya Kant said that the Supreme Court faced such attacks every day, but insisted that no one needed to be worried about the freedom and strength of the judiciary.
‘We respect the judiciary’: source of government
Meanwhile, top government sources have told the NDTV of “honor” for the judiciary.
Read | “Respect for judiciary paramount”: Row among government sources
The government told NDTV, “All pillars of democracy are working together … the judiciary and the Legislature are two sides of the same coin.”
NDTV is now available on WhatsApp channels. Click the link To get all the latest updates from NDTV on your chat.
